1. The RotCast Episode #64 - Going Crazies

    In this episode we talk the George Romero remake The Crazies, discuss the direct-to-DVD time-recursion horror flick Triangle, make our Oscar picks, and much much more!

    ~~ Show Notes ~~
    00:00:00 – Intro & Reviews

    • The Crazies review
    • Triangle discussion

    01:03:33 – Whatcha’ Watchin ?

    • Survivor: Heroes -vs- Villains chat
    • Dave and Andrea watch 2012 and Bourne: Ultimatum
    • Dave re-watches 2004’s Dawn of the Dead remake (again)
    • Andrea watches Shaun of the Dead “20 times in 3 months”
    • Star Wars Holiday Special discussion
    • Andrea watches Nola and Mr. 11
    • Recent rash of celebrity suicides
    • James watches More Than A Game (2008 LeBron James doc), The Dark Knight, Thirst, The Informant!, The Box, The Messenger, Fantastic Mr. Fox
    • We make our Oscar picks

    02:22:30 – Goodbyes

    Download MP3

    [Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

  2. Watchlist: The Crazies (2010)

    The Crazies (2010)
    Directed by Breck Eisner
    Watched 2/25/2010 (Advance Screening) - 1st Viewing

    Confession Time: I have never seen the original 1973 version of The Crazies, directed by George Romero. Or, I should say, I haven’t seen ALL of the ‘79 version. I’ve tried many times to get through it, so many times I almost need two hands to count the attempts. The film is BORING, and from what I have seen (about 2/3 of it) extremely predictable. I liken it to a zombie film without any real zombies set in the worst of a late-70’s prime-time TV drama. The acting sucks, one scene is as dull as the next - and its worst crime is typically Romero’s strength - its message. If you like to be preached at for two hours, submit to tracking this turd down - you will love it.

    For those of us that like to enjoy life, stick to director Breck Eisner’s remake, in theaters 2/26/2010. The two films have little to do with each other past the fact that a) they both have “crazy” people in them and b) they share a weak town-wide “government-induced” quarantine plotline. Where the 2010 version shines is in focusing more on the aforementioned “Crazies” than on the original films “big-brother” thesis. Eisner’s film is much about “the scare” than the politics (a Romero staple) and its better for it. The vastly increased budget ($275,000 vs $20,000,000) shows well on screen throughout, and the film benefits greatly from the natural artistic progression the horror genre has experienced in the 37 years since the original.

    I’ll admit it’s a little unfair to pit two similar films against each other when so much time has passed, but whatever - I’m calling it. The 2010 Crazies isn’t anything mind-blowing, it won’t make anyone’s end-of-year list, but it also won’t put you to sleep - which is more than I can say for the original.